There has been an
ongoing discussion on Facebook about the Prayers of the People and whether or
not to pray for the President-elect by name. The Book of Common Prayer does not
require names in any rubrics though many churches do use the name of the President
and other leaders. Our church prays by name for "Our President, Barack,
our Governor, Kate and all local officials." Since the election, we have
added President-elect Donald. For at least the last 4 presidents we have called
them by name.
The reasons for
dropping this practice seems mostly related to the pain the name of the
President-elect causes to those who are terrified of his statements and his
abusive actions towards women especially. It is argued that church must be a
safe space for those who are victims of abuse and those who may be affected by
his proposed policies. Those w
ho advocate for no naming say it is an ethical
issue and that these are times that demand a different response.
My response to this is that the Bible is very clear that we
are to pray for those in authority and for our enemies and those who persecute
us. Jesus, Paul, Peter all speak of this. It is hard for me to do but it is the
practice I want to foster in myself. Naming is a part of that for me. The power
of naming is noted through out the Hebrew Scriptures/Old Testament. By saying
the name I take my power back.
My non-churchgoing brother noted that in the Harry Potter
novels "most characters in the novels refer to Voldemort as
"You-Know-Who" or "He-Who-Must-Not-Be-Named" rather than
say his name aloud." (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lord_Voldemort).
Only a few actually say the name but Dumbledore says that the name has no power
and it is only their own fears. However,
we find out in the last book that Voldemort can
track mentions of his names and uses that to target his enemies, so saying his
name basically sends up a signal flare once he has returned to power.
Which might be a part of the pain and fear that saying the President-elect’s
name evokes.
My spiritual
director modeled praying for her abuser - and I saw that it changed her. Her
prayers did not change the other person and did not say what happened was in
any way anything but evil. I decided to try it and I found a different sort of
peace. Do I still have anger about what happened? Yes, but I am not holding the
poison of that anger and bitterness inside. I wrestled with saying Donald in
the prayers of the people when it was my turn to pray (I am not priest in
charge) - could I do it without being sick? I do it because it is my practice
and it is a decision that our church made after the election.
Also there are people in our
congregation who choked on praying for "Barack" by name and who voted
for the president-elect. They would find it more than odd if we stopped our
practice of naming now. They already feel in the minority in the Episcopal
Church but soldier on in the community.
I wonder about the idea of church as
safe space and think that sets us up for failure. I have not found it to be
safe all the time. Many Bible passages are terrifying: Lot offering his
daughters to the crowd to be raped. Eli's sons use their position to take
advantage of women. Jephthah's daughter is
sacrificed because of a rash promise. The crucifixion.
From Annie Dillard:
“On the whole, I do
not find Christians, outside of the catacombs, sufficiently sensible of
conditions. Does anyone have the foggiest idea what sort of power we so
blithely invoke? Or, as I suspect, does no one believe a word of it? The
churches are children playing on the floor with their chemistry sets, mixing up
a batch of TNT to kill a Sunday morning. It is madness to wear ladies’ straw
hats and velvet hats to church; we should all be wearing crash helmets. Ushers
should issue life preservers and signal flares; they should lash us to our
pews. For the sleeping god may wake someday and take offense, or the waking god
may draw us out to where we can never return.”
Also I wonder about only praying by
name for those who we think are "good people" which seems to come out
in these discussions. That seems to set up a dynamic where we use prayer as a
form of approval or disapproval.
The discussion has
made me think about what I believe about prayer and what I think we are doing
when we pray. But in the end for me it comes down to following Jesus in his way
and prayer is something he talks about more than anything else. A few passages
that I take seriously:
Matthew
5:43-45 "You
have heard that it was said, 'Love your neighbor and hate your enemy.' But
I tell you, love your enemies and pray for those who persecute you, that
you may be children of your Father in heaven. He causes his sun to rise on the
evil and the good, and sends rain on the righteous and the unrighteous.
Luke 6:27-28 "But I tell you who hear Me: Love your
enemies, do good to those who hate you, bless those who curse you, pray for
those who mistreat you."
Romans
12:19-20 Do not take revenge, my dear friends, but
leave room for God's wrath, for it is written: "It is mine to avenge; I
will repay," says the Lord. On the contrary: "If your enemy is
hungry, feed him; if he is thirsty, give him something to drink. In doing this,
you will heap burning coals on his head."
1 Peter 3:9 Do not repay evil for evil or abuse for abuse; but, on the
contrary, repay with a blessing. It is for this that you were called—that you
might inherit a blessing.
Then of course there is this from Fiddler on the Roof on
blessing the Tsar.
-->
This essay first appeared at
Episcopal Café